


A | Ohio residents this week began voting on a constitutional amendment whose fate will ultimately determine abortion access in the state.Voters are considering two ballot initiatives; ballots began being accepted on Wednesday and go through Election Day on Nov. 7.The two measures are: Issue 1, the amendment that if approved would add abortion rights to the state constitution; and Issue 2, which would legalize recreational marijuana.The proposed abortion amendment would establish an "individual right to one's own reproductive medical treatment including but not limited to abortion" and then creates legal protections for those individuals, among other guarantees like for contraception and fertility treatment.The marijuana measure, if passed, would make Ohio the 24th state to legalize cannabis and would allow adults 21 years and older to buy and possess up to 2.5 ounces of flower and 15 grams of extract.In August, Ohio voters resoundingly rejected a contentious, Republican-backed ballot measure that would have raised the threshold for future changes to the state constitution -- an effort that would have specifically made it more difficult for the abortion amendment to pass.When the U.S. Supreme Court struck down its previous Roe v. Wade ruling, in 2022, the justices returned the question of abortion access to individual states. Since then, while some states have largely ceased abortion access, others have taken up ballot measures that put the question before voters. In those cases -- in both red and blue states so far -- voters have rejected the potential for abortion restrictions and bans or elected to expand access.On Sept. 27, the Ohio Supreme Court started hearing arguments about the state's six-week abortion ban, which was previously put on hold by a lower court.The success or failure of the abortion ballot measure could render that case moot, if state voters add abortion access to their constitution.Both sides have built up mobilization efforts over the past few weeks -- knocking on doors, canvassing and hosting rallies across the state."Whether you're pro-life or pro-choice, Issue 1 just goes too far," Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, a Republican, said at a recent event at the Ohio GOP's headquarters.Ohio Democrats claimed last week to have been inching toward 100,000 doors knocked and more than 100,000 calls made in the time since their win in the August special election."We're not leaving anything behind as we work to protect women's rights to choose and prevent Ohio's extreme abortion ban from taking effect," Ohio Democratic Chairwoman Elizabeth Walters said during a recent press briefing.There's also been significant financial investment in the race. According to numbers from AdImpact released last week, $12.3 million had been spent or reserved in advertising around the abortion ballot measure, with anti-amendment groups outspending amendment supporters by about $1.6 million.

B | 认真调查。” 高盛图表显示,2027年美国主要云服务商的资本开支预计接近1万亿美元,约为中国预测投入的8倍。 美国分析人士指出,美国拥有更多先进芯片、更大的数据中心预算,中国公司却用小得多的算力做到了逼近前沿。

C | 如果中国AI实验室能够以较低成本接近美国模型的表现,美国接近1万亿美元的基础设施投入将更难解释。 闭源模型可以对每一次调用收费,还能控制安全规则、用户入口和价格,开放模型的变现路径要曲折得多。 开放模型通常还要靠更低的价格换取开发者采用,但K3没有被贴上低价标签。据报道,它的API每百万输出token定价15美元,高于月之暗面上一代模型的4美元,也高于部分开放权重同行。 在完成一项具体任务的综合成本上,据Artificial Analysis测算,K3约0.94美元,接近GPT-5.6 Sol的1.04美元,约为Claude Opus 4.8(1.80美元)的一半。美国银行研究分析师的一份报告也给出同一方向的判断,表示K3是迄今定价最高的中国AI模型,但仍只有GPT-5.6 Sol的一半。 黄震昕说,Kimi的商业模式对标海外成熟头部AI企业,“开源模型、中国大模型不该被贴上低价标签。

D | 我们做出了SOTA级模型,也能匹配合理的商业定价。” 关于Kimi K3的评测结果也进入了美国政策顾问的讨论。美国总统科技顾问委员会联席主席戴维·萨克斯称,K3登上前端编程榜首“令人担忧”。

E | 他还指出,这是第一次有中国模型拿下编程头名。他随后列出美国正在给自己增加的阻力,包括阻挡数据中心建设、叠加州级监管、推动前沿模型发布前审批程序,“这就是输掉AI竞赛的方式。”萨克斯写道。 当地时间7月21日,美国财政部长贝森特公开谈到中国开源模型。他表示,美国政府将审查有代表性的中国模型。 美国追问: 为什么先做出来的是一家中国公司 政策讨论之外,美国人也在追问,为什么先走这一步的是一家中国公司。美国投资人、学者和媒体的讨论主要集中在三个方面。

F | 第一类答案,美国头部实验室不愿放弃已经建立起来的闭源生意。 美国风险投资机构Benchmark合伙人比尔·格利写道:“开放前沿已经不再只是一个中国故事。”他认为,AI经济中的几乎所有参与者都有理由偏爱开放的基础模型,“只有大型既有企业Anthropic和OpenAI例外,它们的命运取决于维持封闭”。 第二类答案,美国施加的芯片限制迫使中国公司把更多工程投入放在技术突破和发明上。 美国限制中国获得先进AI芯片,本意是拉开算力差距。

G | 澳大利亚新南威尔士大学计算机科学家托比·沃尔什说,中国公司在芯片受限的情况下仍造出了前沿模型,“人们不禁会想,或许正是这种‘必要’成了发明之母”。

H | 这一点在Kimi K3身上似乎有印证,它虽有2.8万亿总参数,却采用混合专家架构,处理每个token时只激活896个专家里的16个,靠Kimi Delta Attention和注意力残差等结构改动,使整体扩展效率比上一代K2提升约2.5倍。 第三类答案,人才最终选择在中国创业,美国没能留下杨植麟。 ▲月之暗面创始人杨植麟在2026年中关村论坛发表演讲(资料图片) 月之暗面创始人杨植麟从清华大学毕业后,在卡内基梅隆大学取得计算机科学博士学位,随后在Google Brain和Meta AI工作,2023年回国创办月之暗面。K3受到关注后,一些美国投资人、创业者和AI研究人员发问:如果杨植麟留在美国,结果是否会有所不同?为什么一个在美国顶尖体系里受过训练的研究者,最后在中国组队做出了Kimi K3? 投资人维诺德·科斯拉怪罪美国的移民政策,称它“正在吓跑聪明的人才”。 杨植麟的博士导师、卡内基梅隆大学的鲁斯·萨拉霍丁诺夫曾担任苹果的AI研究主管。 据报道,K3发布后,他公开写道:“这对开源社区是多大的胜利!感觉植麟昨天才从我的实验室毕业。”他表示,杨植麟实际上有很多个留在美国的机会,也有能力进入苹果这样的大型科技公司,不过,他很早就打算回国创办自己的公司。 红星新闻记者 邓纾怡 编辑 邓旆光 审核 高升祥。
Current article:http://7362v.jiubengtaibingpengou.pics/0k0kug/20260826/40253.html
Published on:19:17:10